I recently wrote about the
misconception that schools are responsible for teaching students how
to daven. I suggested that the real onus falls upon the parents. This
does not mean that schools do not play a role in helping to produce
Jews who take davening seriously. It just means that schools have a
different role. While the parents role is largely mimetic, the
schools role is, or at least should be, educational. The problem is
that overwhelmingly, tefillah is treated simply as tefillah, with
schools copying that which is done in shuls, rather than treating it
as an educational endeavor. I do not mean to suggest that nothing
educational goes on during tefilla at most schools. Rather I am
suggesting that the whole endeavor is not addressed educationally.
What follows is an 'immodest proposal' for an educational approach to
tefilla.
The challenges
For the average
English speaking student, tefillah has many challenges. They include
the language, fluency, the poetic style of some of the tefillot, the length of
tefillah, a lack of quiet/God centered space, as well as a lack of understanding of what tefillah is
about (which is somewhat connected to the challenge of the words
being repetitive).
Any educational
attempt to help students engage in prayer needs to address these
challenges. I will address each one after an introduction of my
proposal.
Proposal
Tefillah needs to be something that is
worked on throughout the years of schooling (in this essay, I address
Modern Orthodox high schools, although certainly, some of what I
write could possibly be adjusted for younger students, or students in
other educational settings). It also needs to be dealt with outside
of the time of actual tefillah. That way, tefillah is a time when the
lessons learned, can be tried and practiced. Additionally, it will
not only be addressed in one particular class, but across the
curriculum as well.
Addressing the challenges
Language
If I were to give you a beautiful prayer in Chinese, with the words
written phonetically in English, you would be unable to pray with
much kavanah. You might be able to think of yourself as standing
before God (omeid lifeni HaMakom, which is no small thing), but you
would certainly be unable to do anything beyond that. For many of our
students, that is what davening feels like. They can read the words,
but have no idea what they are saying.
The solution is not to merely teach them the meaning of the words.
The ideas behind the words, including the pesukim from which they
come, and the ideas that Chazal put into them, have to be taught as
well. Teachers might make use of the Avudraham or a gemara from Megillah or Brachos.
Let's not fool ourselves. Our students will not learn every word and
idea, but by teaching them some of these things, we begin to make it
possible to engage in serious tefillah.
Fluency
For any of us who have heard a chazzan struggle with the words, it is clear that fluency in pronouncing the words needs to be addressed. A simple bu effective way to do so would be to take the Sephardic approach of saying the whole tefillah (except the amidah) out loud.
Fluency
For any of us who have heard a chazzan struggle with the words, it is clear that fluency in pronouncing the words needs to be addressed. A simple bu effective way to do so would be to take the Sephardic approach of saying the whole tefillah (except the amidah) out loud.
Poetic style
Hebrew poetry is already part of the curriculum in many Modern
Orthodox schools, as is Tanach. In at least one of those classes,
preferably the latter, the pirkei Tehillim which make up davening
should be taught, with an emphasis on understanding the ideas and
poetry contained therein. While these perakim will be treated as Tanach, in these classes they will also be dealt with from a literary standpoint.
Length of
tefilla
The gemara says “Better less said with kavanah, than more said
without kavanah” (Rav Hutner humorously changed it to “Better
less said without kavanah, than more said without kavanah”). It
only makes sense to say all of shacharis, if we are trying to mimic a
shul. If, however, tefillah is meant to be educational, than just as
we adjust the curriculum for those who struggle, we can do so with
tefillah, concentrating on removing the less essential parts of
pesukei d'zimra and parts of v'hu rachum. We would of course, make it
clear to our students the idea behind this change.
Additionally, we should make clear to the students that the current
goal is not kavanah throughout the whole shemoneh esrei. If that is
the goal, they will fail each time (as will I). At first the goal
should be to have kavanah for one bracha (an idea which comes from
this thoughtful essay which includes some ideas of how to work on kavanah from a practical standpoint ). Alternatively, students could focus on one phrase that is meaningful for them, making it their own.
Lack of quiet/God centered space
We are all surrounded by constant background noise and activity. Entering the God focused, or meditative space which helps set the tone is a challenge.
A few moments of silence before tefillah (preferably at least several minutes), breathing exercises, or asking everyone to think of something or someone that they are grateful for, are some possible ways to deal with this issue.
Lack of quiet/God centered space
We are all surrounded by constant background noise and activity. Entering the God focused, or meditative space which helps set the tone is a challenge.
A few moments of silence before tefillah (preferably at least several minutes), breathing exercises, or asking everyone to think of something or someone that they are grateful for, are some possible ways to deal with this issue.
What is
tefillah?
In many (most?) Modern Orthodox high schools, Jewish philosophy is
not taught. For many reasons, this needs to change. Among the things
which our students must know,
are the various approaches to why we pray and how it works. As with
all areas of Jewish philosophy, various approaches should be taught
so that our students have the best chance to find an approach which
for them.
Teachers might make use of aggados from the gemara (perhaps with an explanation from Rav Kook's Ain Ayah), Rishomnim such as the Rambam (primarily the Moreh), Rabbeinu Bachya's Chovos Halevavos, Rav Albo's Sefer HaIkarim, and Achronim such as the Mabit, Rav SR Hirsch and chassidic literature, as well as Rav Soloveitchik and Heschel.
Teachers might make use of aggados from the gemara (perhaps with an explanation from Rav Kook's Ain Ayah), Rishomnim such as the Rambam (primarily the Moreh), Rabbeinu Bachya's Chovos Halevavos, Rav Albo's Sefer HaIkarim, and Achronim such as the Mabit, Rav SR Hirsch and chassidic literature, as well as Rav Soloveitchik and Heschel.
Other areas of
learning
Tefillah needs to become more than a cerebral exercise (at best).
Modern Orthodox educators are often moved by ideas, and teach in a
cerebral way. Not all students will respond to this approach. Art,
music, dance and creative writing are some of the ways where tefillah can be
more experiential.
Practically this might include putting a tefillah to music, painting a scene based on a Mizmor Tehillim, or writing an essay on the struggles of tefillah or writing their own tefillah, an idea which Rav Nachman (the Chassidic Rebbe, not the Amora) suggested.
Practically this might include putting a tefillah to music, painting a scene based on a Mizmor Tehillim, or writing an essay on the struggles of tefillah or writing their own tefillah, an idea which Rav Nachman (the Chassidic Rebbe, not the Amora) suggested.
Possible objections to this proposal
Isn't this a
lot of time to spend on tefillah?
In most schools, a minimum of one and a half hours are spent each day
on gemara (I have suggested elsewhere that this is not ideal). If our
students never pick up a gemara after high school (and lets be
honest, some, at least, won't) they can still be serious members of
the Jewish community. If our students spend the rest of their lives
praying as they currently do, that would be tragic. If triage is
needed, it should be clear which one should get more of our
attention.
How does this
address the most difficult students and those who are struggling with
emunah issues?
As educators, we have all dealt with students who refuse to daven.
Some of them go beyond this and disrupt tefillah. A few might even
enjoy getting their teachers upset.
I know this is radical, but shacharis in school should be optional.
Yes, optional. We will not tell the students that davening is not
required. We will simply give them a choice between davening at
school or at home. While some, no doubt, will not daven at home, that
is no different than what they are doing at school. We will also make
it clear that schacharis at school is only for those who wish to try
and work on what they are learning in class. Those who are repeatedly
disruptive will be asked to daven at home.
With all of
this, isn't it difficult to daven with kavanah?
I can't speak for you, but I can speak for myself. For me davening with kavanah is
a big challenge, even though I do not have most of the challenges I have
addressed above. We must make it clear to our students that davening
will take a lifetime to master and that we, at times, struggle to
make it meaningful. By doing so, we give them permission to struggle
and permission to be imperfect. In many ways, this is an important
lesson, and one which needs to be emphasized in discussing Avodas
HaShem.
Practically, a teacher might get up to tell how they deal with the difficulties of davening with kavanah, a student might tell a story, or discuss a strategy that works for them. Inspiring speakers could be brought in from time to time to connect the dots on some of these issues.
Practically, a teacher might get up to tell how they deal with the difficulties of davening with kavanah, a student might tell a story, or discuss a strategy that works for them. Inspiring speakers could be brought in from time to time to connect the dots on some of these issues.
Although my
proposal involves many components, I am not suggesting an all or
nothing approach. Even if time does not allow for all of them, or you
consider some of my ideas to be mistaken or misguided, please
consider making use of the rest.
Comments,
critiques and suggestions can be made below or by email, which can be
sent to rabbipesach@gmail.com.
Great essay. Regarding "Shacharis as optional", I think that having it be the formal beginning of the school day gets the student into the routine of davening with a minyan.
ReplyDeleteAs an aside, this is an excellent essay written by talented outreach Rabbi in the Chicago area. Sadly, had I read this essay 25 yrs ago, my davening would be in a much better place.
http://www.torahlearningcenter.com/index.php/library-home/essays-by-y-karsh/88-essay-26
Thank you Neil. Students who do not or will not daven do not get into any routine. I'm going based on the book "Summerhill" where students are given the choice to engage in that which speaks to them. I believe, that in many cases, the simple choice to attend minyan, without any coercion, will by itself lead to a more meaningful tefillah experience.
ReplyDeleteSad that with only an hour and a half a day, Gemora is where you should be taking the extra time. Not math or some social program. Each student is individual and it would work better if school could concentrate with each student where they want to go with secular subjects as well. I also think that all of these problems have their root with the enduring fantasy that a proper Jewish education can be given with the amount of time allotted. I have written educational programs and there is much frustration that meaningful information, necessary for a girl to develop spiritually, is not given the priority or hours to do it justice. This includes tefilla, the ability to be truly fluent in Ivrit and bekiut in Tanach and practical halachot, including duties of the heart such as ahavat HaShem and yirat HaShem. To become proficient at anything one must first master the prerequisite skills. Tefilla is not primarily an intellectual endeavor and philosophy is not what will bring kavanna. It is much more important that the intellect direct the heart, and here the avoda takes place.
ReplyDeleteRivka,
DeleteDid you read the article I linked to on gemara? It explains my reason for choosing gemara.
While some might there might well be a need for more Torah time in MO HSs, the first step is using the time they have available correctly. Additionally, no such school will give away secular studies for Torah.
Although several of the points are debatable (which is quite normal, of course), I am truly fascinated by this post. Your tone is so very warm, and each word flows with care and compassion. Your thoughts and reflections are based on sound reasoning, and your insightful suggestions are filled with wisdom. While prayer means different things to different people, religious backgrounds and experiences, we could all learn a great deal from this post. Many thanks!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your kind words. Which points did you find to be debatable?
Delete