Talmud Torah, the study of
Torah, is one of the most essential mitzvos in the Torah. Although we
might think of the act of studying as one that has essentially not
changed in thousands of years, this is not the case. For most people
who lived before the invention of the printing press, as well as for
a while after its invention, talmud Torah was usually done by
listening. Other than in the libraries of those who were wealthy,
few, if any, texts could be found in the Jewish home. In talmudic
times, this even included the siddur. This meant that for the most
part, expertise in any area of Torah was not possible for the laymen.
Even, when books became
more available, few men and almost no women, were well versed in the
Talmud, which, along with its commentaries, were the primary tools
for deciding matters of Jewish law. When legal codes were published
beginning with Rambam's “Mishneh Torah”, and especially with the
Shulchan Aruch several centuries later, there were many rabbis who
were bothered by these texts. They were concerned with the idea that
people would use these texts to decide halachic matters on their own,
without knowing the requisite information. Despite these protests,
and the fact that these rabbis were not incorrect in their
assumption, legal codes were here to stay.
In the past 15 years,
another major change has occurred. Computer technology has made
nearly all major works of Jewish law available to anyone who wants
it. The Bar-Ilan Responsa
Project, has made it
possible for anyone to research even the most complex of topics. Once
again, there are protests that laymen should not be deciding matters
of Jewish law, without consulting with an expert. Are those who
protest correct? Possibly, but it doesn't matter. Just as the Mishneh
Torah and Shulchan Aruch thrived despite the protests against their
use, the use of programs like the Bar-Ilan database will not
disappear.
It is not possible to
avoid change. Throughout our history, many of our biggest talmidei
chachamim have been willing to deal with the challenges brought on by
new circumstances. While to be sure, there were those who insisted on
fighting the change, for the most part, they were unsuccessful. To
pick one example, for all but the most dogmatic, no one believes that
the world is less than 6,000 years old. However one reconciles the
idea of it being the year 5774 according to the Jewish calendar, the
idea of a much more ancient past is accepted.
To my mind, the advances
in technology present a wonderful challenge to our rabbinic leaders.
For many, even within the more insular communities, the days where
the local rabbi decided halchic issues, and was, more or less
accepted as the final word, are gone. It is no longer enough for a
rabbi to posken. He must make a case for why his understanding is
correct. Of course, part of this case involves explaining the sources
and the thought process that led to the particular decision. It also
involves something else. In order for a psak to be accepted, the
posek needs to make his case in a way that resonates with those
within his community, be it local or global. Part of this case is
living, acting and speaking in a manner that combines scholarship,
piety and compassion. Additionally, it must be clear that the psak
shows an understanding of the realia of the case, as well as the
community who is being addressed. To be sure, there will be those who
will insist that nothing but scholarship should matter. Even if that
once was the case, and I suspect that it was not, things have
changed. Once again, great talmidei chachamim are rising to the
challenge and will continue to do so.
Post by Pesach Sommer.
The Maharal is quite vehement -- it was never appropriate for a rabbi to just pasqen without making his case. See Nesivos Olam cheileq 1, Nesiv haTorah, pereq 15 <http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14202&st=&pgnum=71> (and the next page).
ReplyDelete